|
|
Post by Jacksonville Jaguars on May 7, 2013 9:17:17 GMT -5
Saints trade:
Kevin Ogletree TB WR (0.50)
2013 4.13
2016 Round 5 Pick (Jacksonville)
Jaguars trade:
2013 3.10
2013 4.20
Both have accepted through MFL. I desperatley needed WR help and a late pick.
|
|
|
|
Post by speedyRNF (NO) on May 7, 2013 15:43:36 GMT -5
Saints accept (again).
Didn't need the extra WR and was lacking decent picks this year.
And that's 12 trades, not 15
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2013 17:10:41 GMT -5
This is starting to become suspicious, you shouldnt be trading 12 times with the same team before the draft has even taken place
|
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Raiders (Andrew) on May 8, 2013 0:00:46 GMT -5
This is starting to become suspicious, you shouldnt be trading 12 times with the same team before the draft has even taken place I'm with Houston on this. This many trades between the same two teams is far too many, and it needs to stop. All the more so when factoring in that many of the trades have favored one team and there were other trades between these two teams rejected because one team kept giving too much away. I think there needs to be a TAB discussion about setting a limit on the number of trades that the same two teams can make in one year. |
|
|
|
Post by speedyRNF (NO) on May 8, 2013 7:33:46 GMT -5
Makes a little sense. It does. But there's also the fact that not everyone else consistently answers trade offers.. And if you want to change some things, you do what you have to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2013 11:59:10 GMT -5
based on my previous post I will not vote as I would cast a VETO based on the number of trades, nothing wrong with the actual deal but the activity between the two teams
|
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Raiders (Andrew) on May 8, 2013 15:59:24 GMT -5
I'm also going to abstain from a formal veto on this. I have no problem with the actual deal itself but I do not feel these two teams should be permitted to make any more trades with each other during this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by speedyRNF (NO) on May 8, 2013 16:04:13 GMT -5
I will agree that we've probably too many trades, but I will probably protest none for the rest of the year... Off-Season, sure.. But not whole season....
|
|
|
|
Post by Crestmount (Colts) on May 8, 2013 19:07:58 GMT -5
Due to concerns expressed here, and elsewhere, I have decided that this trade will not proceed, and that a freeze on trading between Saints and Jags will be implimented until at least season beginning.
|
|
|
|
Post by speedyRNF (NO) on May 8, 2013 21:01:08 GMT -5
Sounds fair.
|
|
